GradedHealth

Vitamin D

Last reviewed October 2026 · Based on 20 studies

Bottom line

In people with prediabetes, vitamin D supplements lower the chance of developing type 2 diabetes. For most other popular uses — preventing fractures, falls, heart disease or infections, or living longer — large trials show little to no benefit, and very large yearly doses increased falls. Daily vitamin D may modestly lower the risk of dying from cancer and of autoimmune disease.

What it helps with

  • Lowers the risk of type 2 diabetes in people with prediabetes — Benefit, evidence grade A (Strong). Individual-participant meta-analysis of three low-bias RCTs, consistent with a meta-analysis of eight trials; measures diagnosed diabetes.
  • Prevents fractures and falls — No effect, evidence grade A (Strong). Large meta-analysis of 69 RCTs with high-certainty evidence of no effect on fractures.
  • Helps you live longer — No effect, evidence grade A (Strong). Meta-analysis of 52 RCTs with consistent results (no heterogeneity).
  • Prevents heart attacks and strokes — No effect, evidence grade A (Strong). Meta-analysis of five RCTs measuring hard cardiovascular outcomes.
  • Lowers the risk of dying from cancer — Benefit, evidence grade B (Moderate). Meta-analyses of large RCTs disagree on overall significance; benefit appears with daily dosing. Downgraded for inconsistency.
  • Prevents colds and respiratory infections — No effect, evidence grade B (Moderate). Meta-analysis of 40 RCTs; the effect estimate sits at the edge of significance and earlier analyses differed. Downgraded for inconsistency.
  • Lowers the risk of autoimmune disease — Benefit, evidence grade B (Moderate). One very large, well-run RCT (VITAL); not yet replicated.
  • Eases depressive symptoms — Benefit, evidence grade B (Moderate). Meta-analysis of 31 RCTs (moderate certainty); downgraded because effects fade in longer trials.
  • Raises testosterone in men — No effect, evidence grade B (Moderate). Two meta-analyses of randomized trials agree on no effect on total testosterone; downgraded one level because the pooled samples are modest and one review rated the certainty low.

What it is

Vitamin D supplements come mainly as vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D2, and trials have tested both [1]. Trials have given it daily, weekly or as large occasional doses, and the dosing pattern appears to matter [2].

What the research says

Bones, fractures and falls. A 2026 BMJ meta-analysis of 69 trials with 153,902 people found that vitamin D alone had no effect on fractures (36 trials, 92,045 people; high-certainty evidence), and that calcium, vitamin D or both had little to no effect on falls [3].

Type 2 diabetes. In three trials designed for people with prediabetes, vitamin D lowered the risk of developing diabetes by 15%, or 3.3 fewer cases per 100 people over three years, and made a return to normal blood sugar 30% more likely [4]. An earlier analysis of eight trials found the benefit mainly in people without obesity [5].

Living longer and cancer. Across 52 trials with 75,454 people, vitamin D did not lower deaths from all causes or from heart disease, but reduced cancer deaths by 16% [1]. A later analysis of 14 trials (104,727 people) found a smaller, non-significant 6% reduction overall, with a 12% reduction in trials that gave vitamin D daily rather than in large occasional doses [2].

Heart disease. Pooling five randomised trials, vitamin D did not reduce major cardiovascular events, strokes or cardiovascular deaths [6].

Infections. A 2025 meta-analysis of 40 trials with 61,589 people found no statistically significant protection against acute respiratory infections [7].

Autoimmune disease. In the VITAL trial of 25,871 older adults, 2,000 IU a day for about five years reduced confirmed autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis by 22% [8].

Mood. Across 31 trials with 24,189 people, vitamin D3 slightly reduced depressive symptoms, with larger effects in people with depression and in shorter trials; trials longer than a year showed no effect [9].

Testosterone. Two meta-analyses of randomized trials found vitamin D supplements did not raise total testosterone in men: no significant effect across eight trials (mean difference 0.20, not significant) [10], and no clear effect across 11 comparisons, with low certainty [11]. A 12-week trial in 98 healthy men with vitamin D levels below 75 nmol/L found no change [12], and three small trials in men with heart failure, nursing-home residents and deficient immigrants also found no increase [13].

Doses used in studies

The VITAL trial used 2,000 IU a day [8]. The prediabetes trials used 4,000 IU a day or 20,000 IU a week of cholecalciferol [4]. A single yearly dose of 500,000 IU increased falls and fractures [14].

Safety and interactions

  • Very large single doses: older women given 500,000 IU once a year fell 15% more often and had 26% more fractures than those on placebo [14].
  • High blood calcium: in studies of very high 'mega-doses', side effects — measured as high calcium in blood or urine — occurred in 1.9% to 18.5% of patients [15].
  • Kidney stones and calcium at usual trial doses: in the prediabetes trials, kidney stones, high blood calcium and high urine calcium were not significantly more common with vitamin D, but the trials were not designed to detect safety problems [4].
  • Serious side effects: across 38 infection trials, serious adverse events were no more common with vitamin D than with placebo [7].
  • Upper limit and long-term use: the upper tolerable intake for the general population is 4,000 IU a day [16]. In 22 trials lasting six months or longer, 3,200 to 4,000 IU a day raised the risk of high blood calcium (risk ratio 2.21, about 4 cases per 1,000 people), and also raised falls and hospital stays; the authors judged safety reporting in these trials to be incomplete [16].
  • Pregnancy: a 2024 Cochrane review of 10 trials found the evidence on pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes and preterm birth very uncertain [17].
  • Kidney disease: in adults with chronic kidney disease, vitamin D therapy raised blood calcium and did not reduce deaths from any cause [18].
  • Medicines: this page does not yet cover drug interactions; ask a pharmacist or doctor before combining vitamin D with other medicines.

Caveats and open questions

Most people in the fracture trials lived independently and were not at high risk of fractures or falls, and evidence for high-risk people or care-home residents is more limited [3]. The cancer-death benefit depends on which trials are pooled and on daily dosing [2] [1].

References

  1. Association between vitamin D supplementation and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMJ, 2019.
  2. Efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation on cancer mortality: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.. Ageing Res Rev, 2023.
  3. Calcium, vitamin D, or combined supplementation to prevent fractures and falls: systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMJ, 2026.
  4. Vitamin D and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes in People With Prediabetes : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data From 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.. Ann Intern Med, 2023.
  5. Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Prediabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. Diabetes Care, 2020.
  6. Effect of vitamin D supplementation for major adverse cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis based on randomised controlled trials.. Br J Nutr, 2025.
  7. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of stratified aggregate data.. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2025.
  8. Vitamin D and marine omega 3 fatty acid supplementation and incident autoimmune disease: VITAL randomized controlled trial.. BMJ, 2022.
  9. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on depression: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. Psychol Med, 2024.
  10. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on the androgenic profile in men: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.. Andrologia, 2019.
  11. Vitamin D Supplementation, Total Testosterone, and Androgen Bioavailability Markers in Adult Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Nutrients, 2026.
  12. Vitamin D and Testosterone in Healthy Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2017.
  13. Vitamin D supplementation and testosterone concentrations in male human subjects.. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 2015.
  14. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial.. JAMA, 2010.
  15. Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review.. Clin Nutr ESPEN, 2021.
  16. Long-term supplementation with 3200 to 4000 IU of vitamin D daily and adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. Eur J Nutr, 2023.
  17. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2024.
  18. Vitamin D Therapy in Adults With CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. Am J Kidney Dis, 2023.