rTMS for Tinnitus
Last reviewed October 2026 · Based on 4 studies
Bottom line
In a 2025 meta-analysis of 16 trials, magnetic brain stimulation (rTMS) beat sham stimulation on tinnitus handicap and a visual rating scale, with a short-term effect at one month. The benefit was not seen at six months, and earlier and later analyses found no significant overall effect.
What it helps with
- Reduces tinnitus severity — Mixed results, evidence grade C (Limited). A 2025 meta-analysis found better scores than sham at one month but not six, while a 2020 meta-analysis and a 2026 analysis found no significant effect; downgraded for inconsistency.
What it is
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive technique that uses pulsed magnetic fields to modulate neural activity [1]. It has been tested as a treatment for chronic tinnitus [1].
What the research says
2025 meta-analysis. 16 randomised trials with 1,105 people with chronic tinnitus. rTMS was better than sham on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and a visual scale, with a positive effect at one month but not at six months, and no immediate effect on the Tinnitus Questionnaire or loudness matching [1].
Other analyses. A 2020 meta-analysis of low-frequency rTMS (10 trials, 567 people) found no significant benefit over sham at short, medium or long term [2]. A 2026 analysis of 8 rTMS trials (432 people) found a small, non-significant pooled effect (SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.07) [3]. A review of study settings found that real rTMS beat sham in the proportion of significant before-and-after changes, and that lower stimulation intensity was linked to significant effects [4].
Doses used in studies
Settings varied widely between trials, and some, such as pulse waveform, were not reported [4]. No single dose is established.
Safety and interactions
Side effects. Few mild or moderate adverse events occurred, and they were similar in the rTMS and sham groups [2]. A 2026 review described adverse events across non-invasive stimulation as mild and temporary [3].
Interactions, limits, pregnancy and other conditions. No data were found in the studies read.
Caveats and open questions
Two large trials gave different results, and the pooled analyses disagree [4][2][1]. More trials with uniform protocols and longer follow-up are needed [1][2].
References
- Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for subjective chronic tinnitus: a randomized controlled trial meta-analysis.. Front Neurosci, 2025.
- Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Biomed Res Int, 2020.
- Neuromodulation for Subjective Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.. Laryngoscope, 2026.
- RTMS parameters in tinnitus trials: a systematic review.. Sci Rep, 2019.