GradedHealth

Chasteberry

Last reviewed October 2026 · Based on 16 studies

Bottom line

Standardised chasteberry extracts have been tested in several placebo-controlled trials, and reviews suggest they ease PMS symptoms more than placebo. The studies are small and vary, so the size of the benefit is uncertain. Chasteberry should be avoided during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

What it helps with

  • Helps with PMS symptoms — Benefit, evidence grade C (Limited). Several placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses; downgraded for inconsistency between studies and high risk of bias, as reported by the reviews.
  • Is safe to use for PMS — No effect, evidence grade C (Limited). Adverse-event review and small open-label data; side effects mild and reversible, but studies were not designed to detect rare serious harms.
  • Is safe in pregnancy and breastfeeding — Harm, evidence grade D (Preliminary). No human pregnancy studies found; expert opinion, in vitro data and one rat study only. Reviews advise avoiding use.

What it is

Chasteberry is the fruit of the shrub Vitex agnus-castus, and fruit extracts have long been used for premenstrual and menstrual complaints [1]. Trials used standardised extracts such as Ze 440 and BNO 1095, as well as liquid drops; the exact product matters [2].

What the research says

A 2019 meta-analysis of three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (520 women) found that women taking chasteberry were 2.57 times as likely to have their symptoms go into remission as those on placebo (95% CI 1.52 to 4.35) [3]. A 2017 meta-analysis of 14 trials found a large pooled effect (Hedges g −1.21), but heterogeneity was very high (I² 91%) and most trials had a high risk of bias, so the authors judged the figure likely overstated [4]. In a 2013 review, seven of eight PMS trials found the extract superior to placebo or to other treatments [5].

In a trial of 162 women, 20 mg a day of Ze 440 reduced symptoms more than placebo or 8 mg, and 30 mg was no better than 20 mg [6]. In a three-cycle trial of 67 women using BNO 1095, the symptom score fell from 29.4 to 4.3 and from 28.8 to 11.8 with placebo [7].

Doses used in studies

Ze 440 was tested at 8, 20 and 30 mg a day for three menstrual cycles; 20 mg was the dose that beat placebo [6]. BNO 1095 was given as one tablet a day for three cycles [7]. One drop-based extract was taken as 40 drops a day from six days before menses, over six cycles [8]. A Japanese open-label study used 20 mg a day for three cycles, with no control group [9].

Safety and interactions

The most frequent side effects in the reviewed data were nausea, headache, stomach upset, menstrual changes, acne, itching and rash; they were mild and reversible [1]. One Japanese open-label study reported no substantial adverse events [9]. No drug interactions were reported in the safety review, but it noted a theoretical risk with medicines that block dopamine [1]. Reviews advise avoiding chasteberry during pregnancy or breastfeeding, and human evidence on pregnancy is poor [1][10]. In rats, an extract given before or during pregnancy changed pregnancy and fetal outcomes; this is animal data only [11]. Our searches found no human studies on liver injury, kidney disease, bleeding disorders, or upper limits and toxic doses.

Caveats and open questions

Many trials were small, and the 2019 review found that most could not be used as efficacy evidence because the product was poorly described [3]. Only two trials compared chasteberry with fluoxetine for severe PMS, with mixed results [5]. A pilot trial of PREMEN-CALM, a combination product, found no difference between the active and placebo groups in 42 women [12]. A 2024 real-world study of 1,700 women had no placebo group, and several authors are employees of Bionorica SE [13]. No recruiting trials were found in the registry search.

References

  1. Vitex agnus castus: a systematic review of adverse events.. Drug Saf, 2005.
  2. Vitex agnus castus for premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a systematic review.. Arch Womens Ment Health, 2017.
  3. Vitex agnus-castus in premenstrual syndrome: A meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials.. Complement Ther Med, 2019.
  4. The treatment of premenstrual syndrome with preparations of Vitex agnus castus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017.
  5. Vitex agnus-castus extracts for female reproductive disorders: a systematic review of clinical trials.. Planta Med, 2013.
  6. Dose-dependent efficacy of the Vitex agnus castus extract Ze 440 in patients suffering from premenstrual syndrome.. Phytomedicine, 2012.
  7. Treatment of moderate to severe premenstrual syndrome with Vitex agnus castus (BNO 1095) in Chinese women.. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2010.
  8. Therapeutic effect of Vitex agnus castus in patients with premenstrual syndrome.. Acta Med Iran, 2012.
  9. Efficacy and safety of Vitex agnus-castus extract for treatment of premenstrual syndrome in Japanese patients: a prospective, open-label study.. Adv Ther, 2014.
  10. Safety and efficacy of chastetree (Vitex agnus-castus) during pregnancy and lactation.. Can J Clin Pharmacol, 2008.
  11. Does Vitex Agnus-Castus L. Have Deleterious Effect on Fertility and Pregnancy Outcome? An Experimental Study on Rats for Prediction of Its Safety.. J Pharmacopuncture, 2022.
  12. Effects of the PREMEN-CALM® in the Management of the Premenstrual Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study.. J Diet Suppl, 2024.
  13. Use of Vitex agnus-castus in patients with menstrual cycle disorders: a single-center retrospective longitudinal cohort study.. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2024.